Very little thought is required to see that if using C to join A together with B means simply forming the sequence “A C B,” then almost anything can be called a conjunction no stricter or more tightly framed definition has been given. It is based on the vague assertion that a conjunction is a word that “joins” two elements together. They are respecting an ancient analysis that doesn’t work. Why then do all dictionaries make the self-evidently false claim that because is a conjunction, and therefore either like that or like and? In short, they are all followers of a tradition that has needed rethinking for 200 years (some would say it’s more like 2,000 years, because it originates in classical times). Firstly, if you are wondering what part of speech BUT is, most people know that at A1, But is usually a conjunction between words, phrases, or clauses related to contrast. To know for sure what part of speech a word is, we have to look not only at the word itself but also at its meaning, position, and use in a sentence. Also, Because violets are blue, roses are red is a grammatical, alternative way of expressing the same thing as Roses are red because violets are blue. Except for interjections ('ouch'), which have a habit of standing by themselves, the parts of speech come in many varieties and may show up just about anywhere in a sentence. The sentence Roses are red because violets are blue may express a strange claim, but it has a completely different meaning from Violets are blue because roses are red (the causal arrow is reversed). You can use not only with but also to express or emphasize that someone or. The word 'but' is a conjunction, a word that joins groups of words around it together. In English, the main parts of speech are noun, pronoun, adjective, determiner, verb, adverb, preposition, conjunction, and interjection. The opposite of all of this holds for because. The phrase not only is part of a pair that makes up a correlative conjunction. A 'part of speech' is a category to which a word is assigned in accordance with its syntactic functions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |